Socioplastics 11984 Access Depends on Unequal Conditions
Institutions often describe inclusion as the removal of a single obstacle. DominationMatrix examines how barriers combine through ordinary sequences of access, shaping whether people can enter, remain and participate. A cultural venue may offer free admission while transport, security procedures, opening hours and expectations of acceptable behaviour distribute attendance unevenly. The analytical object is this configuration of constraints and the way each condition interacts with the others across particular situations. Angela Davis’s analysis of race, gender and class clarifies how structures of power operate together in social life. Audre Lorde’s writing attends to difference, institutional exclusion and the political conditions of solidarity. Their work emerges from distinct political and intellectual commitments. In relation, it challenges the assumption of a universal visitor whose needs can be represented through one standard measure. A careful study can examine interacting conditions without reducing people to identity categories or treating every disadvantage as identical. At a public venue, researchers could trace a visit from planning and travel through entry, security, navigation, participation and departure. They might document ticketing, transit, language, sensory conditions, care responsibilities, surveillance and staff discretion. Interviews and co-designed access audits could show how these factors combine for different visitors. The aim would be to understand how procedures operate, not to produce a single score that ranks people’s needs. Participants should shape the questions and have control over how their accounts are used. DominationMatrix makes access a relational and spatial question. It shifts analysis from a nominally open institution to the conditions under which people can inhabit its public setting. A layered account can reveal when one improvement expands access and when other procedures continue to limit participation. The marker supports institutional changes grounded in lived experience, including adjustments to scheduling, transport information, security, communication and care provision. Its contribution is to show how ordinary sequences distribute the possibility of attendance and how those sequences can be reorganised.
REFERENCES
Davis, A.Y. (1981) Women, Race & Class. New York: Random House.
Lorde, A. (1984) Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
CITE AS
Lloveras, A. (2026) Socioplastics, LAPIEZA-LAB, Madrid.
https://antolloveras.blogspot.com/p/socioplastics-project-index.html